Quick answer: Yes, WatermarkRemover.now handles video (MP4/MOV/AVI up to 500 MB, 2 minutes, 1080p, 1 credit), batch processing in the dashboard, and full-screen or semi-transparent marks via Manual mode. Packs start at $1.99 one-time for 1000 credits (about $0.004 per image), with a free daily tier. Most images finish in under a minute (median 48 seconds). Only remove watermarks from files you own or are allowed to edit. (61 words)
Searches like "does watermarkremover.now support video" and "bulk watermark removal" turn up a lot of guessing. This post skips the guessing. Every number below comes from the current product and pricing, dated where it matters, so you can decide in one read whether this tool fits your file.
Only remove watermarks from content you own or have permission to edit. Everything below assumes that.
Does it handle video?
Yes. The video watermark remover accepts MP4, MOV, and AVI files up to 500 MB and 2 minutes long, at up to 1080p resolution. A video costs 1 credit to process.
That is a real, checkable limit, not a marketing round number. If your clip is longer than 2 minutes or heavier than 500 MB, trim or compress it first; the tool will not silently downgrade a longer file, it needs the source inside that window.
Detection runs frame by frame, so a moving or drifting mark is tracked through the clip rather than treated as one fixed box. Static logos in a corner are the easy case; a mark that moves or fades across busy motion is harder for any tool, ours included.
Does it do batch processing?
Yes. The dashboard supports batch processing: queue several images, videos, or PDFs and let them run instead of uploading one file, waiting, downloading, and repeating. This is the practical answer to "bulk watermark removal" queries, it is a dashboard feature, not a separate paid tier or a support ticket.
Pro tip: batch a set of similar files together (same watermark position, same source type) so you can spot-check one result and trust the rest, rather than reviewing every file individually.
Can it remove a full-screen or semi-transparent watermark?
This is the case worth being honest about. A full-screen or semi-transparent overlay leaves the model very little clean background to sample, so automatic detection alone is the least reliable path here.
Manual mode is built for exactly this. Instead of trusting auto-detect to find the edges of a mark that covers the whole frame, you draw the mask yourself, over the logo, the semi-transparent band, or the tiled stamp, and the model reconstructs only what you selected. A tighter, hand-drawn mask beats a guessed one every time the watermark is large or low-contrast.
If you are dealing with a full-screen mark, start in Manual mode rather than the automatic pass. It takes a few extra seconds and produces a cleaner result.
What does it cost per file?
| Tool | Cheapest paid tier | Cost per image |
|---|---|---|
| WatermarkRemover.now | $1.99 one-time, 1000 credits | ~$0.004 |
| watermarkremover.io | $9/month subscription, 10 credits | ~$0.90 |
| unwatermark.ai | $3.90/month subscription, 50 credits | ~$0.078 |
*Prices checked 2026-07-06. See the full breakdown, including sourcing, on WatermarkRemover.now vs Unwatermark.*
An image costs 2 credits, a video or PDF costs 1 credit. Packs are one-time purchases (from $1.99 for 1000 credits, up to larger packs on the pricing page), credits never expire, and there is no subscription to cancel. A free tier gives you 3 credits a day if you want to try the tool before buying a pack.
The comparison above is not about who has the shinier feature list. It is the same unit (one image) priced across tools that were actually checked on the same day. Subscription pricing from competitors looks small per month until you divide by what you actually process.
How fast is it, really?
Most images finish in under a minute. The median across production runs is 48 seconds. Some files, especially larger or visually complex ones, take a few minutes instead of seconds. That is the honest range, not a cherry-picked best case.
We do not claim to be the fastest tool available, because we have not benchmarked every competitor under identical conditions. What we do publish is our own measured numbers and exactly how we measured them: browser resource timing from upload-start to result-available, across real production runs. The full methodology is on the /technology page if you want to see how the number was produced before you trust it.
Why the results hold up: the technology behind it
The processing is not a thin wrapper calling a generic third-party image API. WatermarkRemover.now runs purpose-built in-house AI models on custom inference accelerators, built by a team with frontier-lab experience.
That distinction matters for two practical reasons. First, in-house models can be tuned specifically for watermark detection and reconstruction, rather than repurposed from a general-purpose image editor. Second, owning the inference stack is what makes the batch processing and the sub-minute median above possible at the price point above; there is no per-call markup from a third-party API sitting between your upload and your result.
If you want the full technical story, model choices, and the speed methodology in one place, read /technology.
Stay within the rules
Only remove a watermark from a file you own or are allowed to edit. That covers your own exports, licensed footage and images, and previews you have explicit permission to clean up. Using any of the features above to strip a mark from someone else's work and pass it off as your own can break copyright and platform rules.
Final recommendation
If your question was "does this support video, batch jobs, or a full-screen mark", the answer to all three is yes, with real limits: video up to 500 MB and 2 minutes at 1080p, batch queues in the dashboard, and Manual mode for marks that cover most of the frame. Pricing starts at $1.99 one-time for 1000 credits, with a free daily tier to test it first.
Start with the video watermark remover for a clip, or the image watermark remover for a batch of photos, and check /pricing if you want the full breakdown of pack sizes before you commit.